JFK, la Cia e il fucile italiano

Pessimismo che sconfina nella rassegnazione...una persona può farsi un'idea personale plausibile sui fatti senza bisogno d'aspettare che si aprano gli archivi segreti o si celebrino i processi.
O no?

Si

Ma in fondo i documenti ci sono già. Aggiunta ad una buona conoscenza storica, una certa dose di intelligenza e di coscienza critica...
L'archivio segreto di turno non è che il timbro del notaio.

Chissà come mai certe coscienze critiche si esercitano soltanto quando di mezzo ci sono l'America e gli Americani, mentre quando ci sono i sovietici, i comunisti e gli islamici tali medesime coscienze vagolano nel torpore più assonnato e profondo da linea blu di sonno REM.
Chissà chissà chissà...

[quote=aquilareale;682280]Chiss

Mi meraviglio che un filoproletario come te apostrofi qualcuno con disprezzo usando il termine "contadino". però è vero che nella prima Unione Sovietica i contadini per i 2/3 furono epurati in quanto difensori di quella misera proprietà privata che erano i frutti della loro terra, quindi tutto in linea.

[quote=aquilareale;683446]Mi meraviglio che un filoproletario come te apostrofi qualcuno con disprezzo usando il termine "contadino". per

Così dicevano Juri Andropov e Vladimir Putin quando interrogavano i loro sospetti nel carcere della Lubjanka. Ma qui non siamo in URSS.
Inoltre un povero contadino ignorante come tu dici che io sono non arriva nemmeno a capire i fini ragionamenti delle superiori menti illuminate degli intellettuali supremi. Egli ha un QI insufficiente sai?

Basta.

Alla prossima ti dò le vacanze.

In siberia, così sei contento.

Ecco giunge l'intervento censorio. E ci si immagina che il tapino (sempre contadino e sempre di più ignorante) tremi verga a verga dal terrore perchè inquisito dall'occhio onnipresente e onniscente del Grande Fratello (vero mito della sinistra seguito tra gli altri da Visco Vincenzo). Sto leggendo un libro sulla rivoluzione russa. Trozky parlava di "normalizzazione".
Mi vuoi "normalizzare" Cornolio? La Repubblica Italiana "normalizzò" e se ne sono visti i risultati.

Mi scusi se è in inglese...Il documento piu vicino alla verità sul 9/11
ed è stato ricosciuto come tale .

CounterPunch
Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair
Tells the Facts and Names the Names
VOL. 14, NO. 3/4
2007, 3 & 4 of 22 issues.
$2.50
On the afternoon of September 11,
2001, an FBI bulletin known as
a BOLO – “be on lookout” – was issued with regard to three suspicious
men who that morning were seen leaving the New Jersey waterfront minutes after the first plane hit World Trade Center 1. Law enforcement officers
across the New York-New Jersey area were warned in the radio dispatch to watch for a “vehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack”:
White, 2000 Chevrolet van… with ‘Urban Moving Systems’ sign on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of jetliner
into World Trade Center… Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion. FBI Newark Field Office requests that, if the van is located, hold for prints and detain individuals.
What Did Israel Know in Advance of the 9/11 Attacks?
At 3:56 p.m., twenty-five minutes after the issuance of the FBI BOLO, officers with the East Rutherford Police Department stopped the commercial moving van through a trace on the plates. According to the police report, Officer Scott DeCarlo and Sgt. Dennis Rivelli approached the stopped van, demanding
that the driver exit the vehicle. The driver, 23-year-old Sivan Kurz*berg, refused and “was asked several more times [but] appeared to be fumbling with a black leather fanny pouch type of bag”. With guns drawn, the police then “physically
removed” Kurz*berg, while four other men – two more men had apparently joined the group since the morning – were also removed from the van, handcuffed, placed on the grass median and read their Miranda rights. They had not been told the reasons for their arrest. Yet, according to DeCarlo’s report, “this officer was told without question by the driver [Sivan Kurzberg],
Cheering Movers and Art Student Spies
• Who Were the Israelis Living Next to
Mohammed Atta?
• What was in the Van on the New Jersey Shore?
• How did Two Hijackers Land on Watch List Weeks Before 9/11?
• Who Shut Down Fox News’ Carl Cameron?
By Christopher Ketcham
(Ketcham’s story cont. on page 2 col one)
Ketcham’s Story
By Alexander Cockburn
& Jeffrey St. Clair
Across these ten pages runs a sober,
carefully reported narrative by a well-respected reporter, Christopher
Ketcham. He’s a journalist whom publications such as Harper’s and Salon.com have been happy to publish. Indeed, it was in May of 2002 that Salon published a 9,000-word story by Ketcham on the so-called Israeli “art students” whose curious activities before 9/11/2001, around U.S. government offices and in locations in many cases identical to those frequented by the 9/11 hijackers,
had been the subject of much speculation.
In the fall of 2005 Ketcham ran across a short report in the Philadelphia
Times-Herald about a 166-page memorandum written by a retired corporate lawyer named Gerald Shea. The memo, which Shea sent to the 9/11 Commission and the relevant
Senate and House intelligence committees, reviewed all publicly known information about the activities
of possible Israeli intelligence operatives working in New Jersey, Florida and elsewhere, and posed the questions: how much had the Mossad learned about the hijackers’ plans; what had they divulged to the agencies
of the U.S. government ?
These are not questions likely to receive an enthusiastic reception in the U.S. press or in Congress. Shea’s memo, which he sent to many major news outlets, received almost no coverage
aside from that tiny story in the Philadelphia Times-Herald (written,
(Israeli spies cont. on page 2 col three)
2/CounterPunch
Editors
Alexander Cockburn
Jeffrey St. Clair
Assistant Editor
Alevtina Rea
Business
Becky Grant
Deva Wheeler
Counselor
B
en Sonnenberg
Published twice monthly except one in July & one in August, 22 issues a year
CounterPunch.
All rights reserved.
CounterPunch
PO Box 228
Petrolia, CA 95558
1-800-840-3683 (phone)
[email protected]
‘We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.’” Another of the five Israelis, again without prompting,
told Officer DeCarlo – falsely – that “we were on the West Side Highway in New York City during the incident”.
From inside the vehicle the officers, who were quickly joined by agents from the FBI, retrieved multiple passports and $4,700 in cash stuffed in a sock. According to New Jersey’s Bergen Record,
which on September 12 reported the arrest of the five Israelis, an investigator
high up in the Bergen County law enforcement hierarchy stated that officers had also discovered in the vehicle
“maps of the city … with certain places highlighted. It looked like they’re hooked in with this”, the source told the Record, referring to the 9/11 attacks. “It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park.”
The five men were indeed Israeli citizens. They claimed to be in the country working as movers for Urban Moving Systems Inc., which maintained a warehouse and office in Weehawken, New Jersey. They were held for 71 days in a federal detention center in Brooklyn, New York, during which time they were repeatedly interrogated by FBI and CIA counterterrorism teams, who referred to the men as the “high-fivers” for their celebratory behavior on the New Jersey waterfront. Some were placed in solitary
confinement for at least forty days; some were given as many as seven lie-detector tests. One of the Israelis, Paul Kurzberg, brother of Sivan, refused to take a lie-detector test for ten weeks. Then he failed it.
Meanwhile, two days after the men were picked up, the owner of Urban Moving Systems, Dominik Suter, a 31-year-old Israeli national, abandoned his business and fled the United States for Israel. Suter’s departure was abrupt, leaving behind coffee cups, sandwiches, cell phones and computers strewn on office tables and thousands of dollars of goods in storage. Suter was later placed on the same FBI suspect list as 9/11 lead hijacker Mohammed Atta and other hijackers
and suspected al-Qaeda sympathizers,
suggesting that U.S. authorities felt Suter may have known something
(Israeli spies continued from page 1)
it should be noted, by Keith Phucas, who broke the Able Danger story).
After reading Shea’s full memo, Ketcham went back to the leads and sources he’d developed for the earlier piece that he’d done for Salon. By May 2006 he’d completed an 11,000-word report for Salon. One hour before it was due to go up on Salon’s site, the story was killed. The word from inside Salon is that the top editors suddenly decided that there was nothing newsworthy about Ketcham’s report.
Anyone familiar with the verbal smokescreens sent up by a publication killing a story knows well two standard ploys: one is the last-minute assertion,
often after weeks of enthusiastic editorial preparation, that “there’s really nothing new here”, that “it’s an old story”. The other is that the facts are so explosive, so fresh, that unusually
explicit corroboration is required, demanding the reporter get multiple named sources and so forth.
Salon’s editors obviously decided that an exposé with words like “Israeli spies” and “9/11” in the same headline was just too hot to handle. But in that case why wait to the last minute, after long hours of editorial work preparing the story for publication? They probably
didn’t like to admit to themselves that were just not prepared to take heat for the story and that they simply got cold feet.
Ketcham took the story to a number of other magazines and got nowhere. Then, in the late summer of 2006 he took it to the Nation, whose editors said that yes, they wanted the story, but wouldn’t schedule it till after the crush of political coverage in the run-up to the November elections. The target publication
date was December 8. At the last minute, the Nation pulled the piece.
When we first read it, we felt – and still feel – somewhat baffled at the difficulty this piece had in getting published. This is a report that deals with substantiated events that demand explanation, starting with the van on the New Jersey shore and the Israelis who were seen cheering as the planes crashed into the towers, and who on the afternoon of 9/11 were arrested following
an FBI alert.
It is not as though Ketcham is alone in probing the background and activities of the celebrating Israelis. That has been the topic of a fine piece of investigation published in The Forward in 2002. The Forward’s sensational discoveries were studiously ignored by the press. (“Old story….”, “unsubstantiated”…)
Similarly, the saga of the “art students” has been the object of careful investigation and broadcast pieces by Fox News’ Carl Cameron.
Yes, when it comes to Israel and the U.S. press we are familiar with obstructions
to raising edgy topics. That’s why we’re glad we have CounterPunch, to welcome good reporters like Ketcham in from the cold. CP.
(Ketcham’s story continued from page 1)
“This officer was told without question
by the driver [Sivan Kurzberg], ‘We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.’”
3/CounterPunch
about the attacks. The suspicion, as the investigation
unfolded, was that the men working for Urban Moving Systems were spies. Who exactly was handling them, and who or what they were targeting,
was as yet uncertain.
It was New York’s venerable Jewish
weekly The Forward that broke this story in the spring of 2002, after months of footwork. The Forward reported that the FBI had finally concluded that at least two of the men were agents working
for the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence
agency, and that Urban Moving Systems, the ostensible employer of the five Israelis, was a front operation. Two former CIA officers confirmed this to me, noting that movers’ vans are a common
intelligence cover. The Forward also noted that the Israeli government itself admitted that the men were spies. A “former high-ranking American intelligence
official”, who said he was “regularly briefed on the investigation
edge”, according to Cannistraro.
A second former CIA counterterrorism
officer who closely followed the case, but who spoke on condition of anonymity, told me that investigators
were pursuing two theories. “One story was that [the Israelis] appeared at Liberty State Park very quickly after the first plane hit. The other was that they were at the park location already”. Either
way, investigators wanted to know exactly what the men were expecting when they got there.
Before such issues had been fully explored, however, the investigation
was shut down. Following what ABC News reported were “high-level negotiations between Israeli and U.S. government officials”,
a settlement was reached in the case of the five Urban Moving Systems suspects. Intense political pressure apparently
had been brought to bear. The reputable Israeli
daily Ha’aretz reported that by the last week of October 2001, about Islamic terrorism as well as its long history of spying on U.S. soil, this does not come entirely as a shock. What’s incendiary is the idea – supported,
though not proven, by several pieces of evidence – that the Israelis did learn something about 9/11 in advance but failed to share all of what they knew with American officials. The questions are disturbing enough to warrant a Congressional
investigation.
Yet none of this information found its way into Congress’s joint committee report on the attacks, and it was not even tangentially referenced in the nearly 600 pages of the 9/11 Commission’s
final report. Nor would a single major media outlet track the revelations of The Forward and ABC News to investigate further. “There weren’t even stories saying
it was bullshit”, says The Forward’s Perelman. “Honestly, I was surprised”. Instead,
the story disappeared into the welter of anti-Israel 9/11 conspiracy theories.
It’s no small boon to the U.S. government
that the story of 9/11-related Israeli espionage has been thus relegated: the story doesn’t fit in the clean lines of the official narrative of the attacks. It brings up concerns not only about Israel’s obligation
not to spy inside the borders of the United States, its major benefactor, but about its possible failure to have provided the U.S. adequate warning of an impending devastating attack on American soil.
Furthermore, the available evidence undermines the carefully cultivated image of sanctity that defines the U.S.-Israel relationship. These are all factors that help explain the story’s disappearance
– and they are compelling reasons to revisit it now.
T
orpedoing the FBI Probe
All five future hijackers of American Airlines Flight 77, which rammed the Pentagon, maintained addresses or were active within a six-mile radius of towns associated with the Israelis employed at Urban Moving Systems. Hudson and Bergen counties, the areas where the Israelis were allegedly conducting surveillance,
were a central staging ground for the hijackers of Flight 77 and their fellow al-Qaeda operatives. Mohammed Atta maintained a mail-drop address
In the months before 9/11, Israel was running an active spy network inside
the United States, with Muslim extremists as the target.some six weeks after the men had been detained, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage and two unidentified “prominent New York congressmen” were lobbying heavily for their release. According
to a source at ABC News close to the 20/20 report, high-profile criminal lawyer Alan Dershowitz
also stepped in as a negotiator on behalf of the men to smooth out differences with the U.S. government. (Dershowitz declined
to comment for this article.) And so, at the end of November
2001, for reasons that only noted they had been working in the country illegally as movers,
in violation of their visas, the men were flown home to Israel.
Today, the crucial questions raised by this matter remain unanswered.
There is sufficient reason – from news reports, statements by former intelligence officials,
an array of circumstantial evidence,
and the reported acknowledgment by the Israeli government – to believe that in the months before 9/11, Israel was running an active spy network inside the United States, with Muslim extremists as the target. Given Israel’s concerns by two separate law enforcement officials”,
told reporter Marc Perelman that after American authorities confronted Jerusalem
at the end of 2001, the Israeli government “acknowledged the operation
and apologized for not coordinating it with Washington”.
Today, Perelman stands by his reporting. I asked him if his sources in the Mossad denied the story. “Nobody stopped talking to me”, he said.
In June 2002, ABC News’ 20/20 followed up with its own investigation into the matter, coming to the same conclusion as The Forward. Vincent Cannistraro, former chief of operations for counterterrorism with the CIA, told 20/20 that some of the names of the five men appeared as hits in searches of an FBI national intelligence database. Cannistraro
told me that the question that most troubled FBI agents in the weeks and months after 9/11 was whether the Israelis had arrived at the site of their “celebration” with foreknowledge of the attack to come. From the beginning, “the FBI investigation operated on the premise that the Israelis had foreknowl4/
CounterPunch
and visited friends in northern New Jersey; his contacts there included Hani Hanjour, the suicide pilot for Flight 77, and Majed Moqed, one of the strongmen who backed Hanjour in the seizing of the plane. Could the Israelis, with or without knowledge of the terrorists’ plans, have been tracking the men who were soon to hijack Flight 77?
In public statements, both the Israeli government and the FBI have denied that the Urban Moving Systems men were involved
in an intelligence operation in the United States. “No evidence recovered suggested any of these Israelis had prior knowledge of the 9/11 attack, and these Israelis are not suspected of working for Mossad”,
FBI spokesman Jim Margolin told me. (The Israeli embassy did not respond to questions for this article.)
According to the source at ABC News, FBI investigators chafed at the denials from their higher-ups. “There is a lot of frustration inside the bureau about this case”, the source told me. “They feel the higher echelons torpedoed
the investigation into the Israeli New Jersey cell. Leads were not fully investigated.” Among those lost leads was the figure of Dominik Suter, whom the U.S. authorities apparently never attempted to contact.
Intelligence expert and author James Bamford told me there was similar frustration within the CIA: “People I’ve talked to at the CIA were outraged at what was going on. They thought it was outrageous that there hadn’t been a real investigation, that the facts were hanging
out there without any conclusion.”
However, what was “absolutely certain”,
according to Vincent Cannistraro, was that the five Israelis formed part of a surveillance network in the New York-New Jersey area. The network’s purpose was to track radical Islamic extremists and/or supporters of militant Palestinian groups like Hamas and Islamic
Jihad. The former CIA counterterrorism officer who spoke anonymously
told me that FBI investigators determined that the suspect
Israelis were serving as Arabic-speaking linguists “running technical operations” in northern New Jersey’s extensive Muslim communities. The former CIA officer said the operations included
taps on telephones, placement of microphones in rooms and mobile surveillance. The source at ABC News agreed: “Our conclusion was that they were Arab linguists involved in monitoring
operations, i.e., electronic surveillance.
People at FBI concur
with this”. The ABC News source added, “What we heard was that the Israelis may have picked up chatter that something was going
to happen on the morning of 9/11”.
The former CIA counterterrorism officer told me: “There was no question
but that [the order to close down the investigation] came from the White House. It was immediately assumed at CIA headquarters that this basically was going to be a cover-up so that the Israelis would not be implicated in any way in 9/11. Bear in mind that this was a political issue, not a law enforcement or intelligence issue. If somebody says we don’t want the Israelis implicated in this – we know that they’ve been spying
the hell out of us, we know that they possibly had information in advance of the attacks, but this would be a political nightmare to deal with.”
I
srael’s “Art Student” Spies
There is a second piece of evidence that suggests Israeli operatives
were spying
on al-Qaeda in the United States. It is writ in the peculiar tale of the Israeli “art students”, detailed by this reporter for Salon.com in 2002, following the leaking
of an internal memo circulated by the Drug Enforcement Administration’s
Office of Security Programs. The June 2001 memo, issued three months before the 9/11 attacks, reported that more than 120 young Israeli citizens, posing as art students and peddling cheap paintings, had been repeatedly – and seemingly
inexplicably – attempting to penetrate DEA offices and other law enforcement and Defense Department offices across the country. The DEA report stated that the Israelis may have been engaged in “an organized intelligence gathering activity”,
but to what end, U.S. investigators,
in June 2001, could not determine. The memo briefly floated the possibility that the Israelis were engaged in trafficking
the drug ecstasy. According to the memo, “the most activity [was] reported in the state of Florida” during the first half of 2001, where the town of Hollywood appeared to be “a central point for these individuals with several having addresses in this area”.
In retrospect, the fact that a large number of “art students” operated out of Hollywood is intriguing, to say the least. During 2001, the city, just north of Miami, was a hotbed of al-Qaeda activity and served as one of the chief staging grounds for the hijacking of the World Trade Center planes and the Pennsylvania
plane; it was home to fifteen of the nineteen future hijackers, nine in Hollywood and six in the surrounding area. Among the 120 suspected Israeli spies posing as art students, more than thirty lived in the Hollywood area, ten in Hollywood proper. As noted in the DEA report, many of these young men and women had training as intelligence and electronic intercept
officers in the Israeli military – training and experience
far beyond the compulsory service mandated by Israeli law. Their “traveling in the U.S. selling art seem[ed] not to fit their background”, according to the DEA report.
One “art student” was a former Israeli
military intelligence officer named Hanan Serfaty, who rented two Hollywood
apartments close to the mail drop and apartment of Mohammed Atta and four other hijackers. Serfaty was moving
large amounts of cash: he carried bank slips showing more than $100,000 deposited from December
2000 through the first quarter of 2001; other bank slips showed withdrawals for about $80,000 during the same period. Serfaty’s apartments,
serving as crash pads for at least two other “art students”, were located at 4220 Sheridan Street and 701 South 21st Avenue. Lead hijacker Mohammed Atta’s mail drop was at 3389 Sheridan Street – approximately 2,700 feet from Serfaty’s
Sheridan Street apartment.
“It was immediately assumed at CIA headquarters
that this basically was going to be a cover-up so that the Israelis would not be implicated in any way in 9/11.”
Both Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi, the suicide pilot on United Airlines Flight 175, which smashed into World Trade Center 2, lived in a rented apartment at 1818 Jackson Street, some 1,800 feet from Serfaty’s South 21st Avenue apartment.
In fact, an improbable series of coincidences
emerges from a close reading of the 2001 DEA memo, the 9/11 Commission’s
staff statements and final report, FBI and Justice Department watch lists, hijacker timelines compiled by major media and statements by local, state and federal law enforcement personnel. In at least six urban centers, suspected Israeli spies and 9/11 hijackers and/or al-Qaeda–connected suspects lived and operated near one another, in some cases less than half a mile apart, for various periods during 2000–01 in the run-up to the attacks. In addition to northern New Jersey and Hollywood,
Florida, these centers included Arlington and Fredericksburg,
Virginia; Atlanta; Oklahoma City; Los Angeles; and San Diego.
Israeli “art students” also lived close to terror suspects in and around Dallas,
Texas. A 25-year-old “art student” named Michael Calmanovic, arrested and questioned by Texas-based DEA officers in April 2001, maintained a mail drop at 3575 North Beltline Road, less than a thousand feet from the 4045 North Beltline Road apartment of Ahmed Khalefa, an FBI terror suspect. Dallas and its environs, especially the town of Richardson, Texas, throbbed with “art student” activity. Richardson is notable as the home of the Holy Land Foundation,
an Islamic charity designated as a terrorist funder by the European Union and U.S. government in December 2001. Sources in 2002 told The Forward, in a report unrelated to the question of the “art students”, that “Israeli intelligence played a key role in helping the Bush administration to crack down on Islamic charities suspected of funneling money to terrorist groups, most notably the Richardson, Texas-based Holy Land Foundation, last December [2001]”. It’s plausible that the intelligence prompting the shutdown of the Holy Land Foundation
came from “art student” spies in the Richardson area.
Others among the “art students” had specific backgrounds in electronic surveillance or military intelligence, or were associated with Israeli wiretapping and surveillance firms, which prompted further concerns among U.S. investigators.
DEA agents described Michael Calmanovic, for example, as “a recently discharged electronic intercept operator for the Israeli military”. Lior Baram, questioned near Hollywood, Fla., in January 2001, said he had served two years in Israeli intelligence “working with classified information”. Hanan Serfaty, who maintained the Hollywood apartments near Atta and his cohorts, served in the Israeli military between the ages of 18 and 21. Serfaty refused to disclose his activities between the ages of 21 and 24, including his activities since arriving in the U.S.A. in 2000. The French daily Le Monde meanwhile reported that six “art students” were apparently using cell phones that had been purchased by a former Israeli vice consul in the U.S.A.
Suspected Israeli spy Tomer Ben which provides phone-billing technology to clients that include some of the largest phone companies in the United States as well as U.S. government agencies. Amdocs,
whose executive board has been heavily stocked with retired and current members of the Israeli government and military, has been investigated at least twice in the last decade by U.S. authorities
on charges of espionage-related leaks of data that the company assured was secure. (The company strenuously denies any wrong-doing.)
According to the former CIA counterterrorism
officer with knowledge of investigations into 9/11-related Israeli espionage, when law enforcement officials
examined the “art students” phenomenon,
they came to the tentative conclusion that “the Israelis likely had a huge spy operation in the U.S. and that they had succeeded in identifying a number of the hijackers”. The German
daily Die Zeit reached the same conclusion in 2002, reporting that “Mossad agents in the U.S. were in all probability surveilling at least four of the 19 hijackers”.
The Fox News Channel also reported that U.S. investigators suspected that Israelis were spying on Muslim militants in the United States. “There is no indication
that the Israelis were involved in the 9/11 attacks, but investigators suspect that the Israelis may have gathered intelligence
about the attacks in advance,
and not shared it”, Fox correspondent Carl Cameron reported
in a December 2001 series that was the first major exposé of allegations of 9/11-related Israeli espionage. “A highly placed investigator said there are ‘tie-ins’. But when asked for details, he flatly refused to describe them, saying, ‘evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered.
It’s classified information.’”
One element of the allegations has never been clearly understood: if the “art students” were indeed spies targeting
Muslim extremists that included al-Qaeda, why would they also be surveilling
DEA agents in such a compromising
manner? Why, in other words, would foreign spies bumble into federal offices by the scores and risk exposing their operation? An explanation is that a number of the art students were, in fact, young Israelis engaged in a mere art scam and unknowingly provided cover Dor, questioned at Dallas-Fort Worth Airport in May 2001, worked for the Israeli wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping
company NICE Systems Ltd. (NICE Systems’ American subsidiary, NICE Systems Inc., is located in Rutherford,
New Jersey, not far from the East Rutherford site where the five Israeli “movers” were arrested on the afternoon of September 11.) Ben Dor carried in his luggage a print-out of a computer file that referred to “DEA Groups”. How he acquired information about so-called “DEA Groups” – via, for example, his own employment with an Israeli wiretapping company – was never determined, according to DEA documents.
“Art student” Michal Gal, arrested by DEA investigators in Irving, Texas, in the spring of 2001, was released on a $10,000 cash bond posted by Ophir Baer, an employee of the Israeli telecommunications
software company Amdocs Inc.,
FBI counter-terrorism
agents speculated
that the CIA was shielding two of the hijackers because
it hoped to recruit them.
5 / CounterPunch
the “art students” had been rounded up and deported simply because of harmless
visa violations. The FBI, for its part, refused to confirm or deny the “art students” espionage story. “Regarding FBI investigations into Israeli art students”,
spokesman Jim Margolin told me, “the FBI cannot comment on any of those investigations.” As with the New Jersey Israelis, the investigation into the Israeli “art students” appears to have been halted by orders from on high. The veteran CIA/NSA intelligence operative told me in 2002 that there was “a great press to discredit the story, discredit the connections, prevent [investigators]
from going any further. People were told to stand down. You name the agency, they were told to stand down”. The operative added, “People who were perceived to be gumshoes on [this matter]
suddenly found themselves hammered
from all different directions. The interest from the middle bureaucracy of ABC News. Barbara Walters was getting
bombarded by calls. The story was a hard sell but ABC News came through – the management insulated [reporters] from the pressure”.
The experience of Carl Cameron, chief Washington correspondent at Fox News Channel and the first mainstream U.S. reporter to present the allegations of Israeli surveillance of the 9/11 hijackers,
was perhaps more typical, both in its particulars and aftermath. The attack against Cameron and Fox News was spearheaded by a pro-Israel lobby group called the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), which operated in tandem with the two most highly visible powerhouse
Israel lobbyists, the Anti-Defamation
League (ADL) and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (itself currently embroiled in a spy scandal connected to the Defense Department and Israeli Embassy). “CAMERA pepIn
at least six urban centers, suspected Israeli spies and 9/11 hijackers and/or al-Qaeda–connected suspects lived and operated near one another, in some cases less than half a mile apart, for various periods during 2000–01.
for real spies. Investigative journalist John Sugg, who as senior editor for the Creative Loafing newspaper chain reported on the “art students” in 2002, told me that investigators he spoke to within FBI felt the “art student” ring functioned as a wide-ranging cover that was counterintuitive in its obviousness.
DEA investigators, for example, uncovered evidence connecting the Israeli “art students” to known ecstasy trafficking operations in New York and Florida. This was, according to Sugg, planted information. “The explanation was that when our FBI guys started getting interested in these folks [the art students] – when they got too close to what the real purpose was – the Israelis threw in an ecstasy angle”, Sugg told me. “The argument being that if our guys thought the Israelis were involved in a smuggling ring, then they wouldn’t see the real purpose of the operation”. Sugg, who is writing a book that explores
the tale of the “art students”, told me that several sources within the FBI, and at least one source formerly with Israeli intelligence, suggested that “the bumbling aspect of the art student thing was intentional.”
When I reported on the matter for Salon.com in 2002, a veteran U.S. intelligence operative with experience subcontracting both for the CIA and the NSA suggested a similar possibility. “It was a noisy operation”, the veteran intelligence
operative said. The operative referred me to the film Victor, Victoria. “It was about a woman playing a man playing a woman. Perhaps you should think about this from that aspect and ask yourself if you wanted to have something
that was in your face, that didn’t make sense, that couldn’t possibly be them”. The intelligence operative added, “Think of it this way: how could the experts think this could actually be something of any value? Wouldn’t they dismiss what they were seeing?”
U.S. and Israeli officials, dismissing
charges of espionage as an “urban myth”, have publicly claimed that the Israeli “art students” were guilty only of working on U.S. soil without proper credentials. The stern denials issued by the Justice Department
were widely publicized in the Washington Post and elsewhere, and the endnote from officialdom and in establishment media by the spring of 2002 was that was not that there had been a security breach but that someone had bothered to investigate the breach. That was where the terror was”.
Choking Off the Press Coverage
There was similar pressure brought against the media venues that ventured to report out the allegations of 9/11-related Israeli espionage. A former ABC News employee high up in the network newsroom told me that when ABC News ran its June 2002 exposé on the celebratory New Jersey Israelis, “Enormous pressure was brought to bear by pro-Israeli organizations” – and this pressure began months before the piece was even close to airing. The source said that ABC News colleagues wondered, “how they [the pro-Israel organizations] found out we were doing the story. Pro-Israeli people were calling the president pered the shit out of us”, Carl Cameron told me in 2002, referring to an e-mail bombardment that eventually crashed the Fox News.com servers. Cameron himself received 700 pages of almost identical e-mail messages from hundreds
of citizens (though he suspected these were spam identities). CAMERA spokesman Alex Safian later told me that Cameron’s upbringing in Iran, where his father traveled as an archeologist, had rendered the reporter “very sympathetic to the Arab side”. Safian added, “I think Cameron, personally, has a thing about Israel” – coded language implying that Cameron was an anti-Semite. Cameron was outraged at the accusation.
According to a source at Fox News Channel, the president of the ADL, Abraham
Foxman, telephoned executives at Fox News’ parent, News Corp., to demand a sit-down in the wake of the Cameron reportage. The source said that Foxman told the News Corp. executives,
6 / CounterPunch
(Israeli spies continued on page 9)
“Look, you guys have generally been pretty fair to Israel. What are you doing putting this stuff out there? You’re killing
us”. The Fox News source continued, “As good old boys will do over coffee in Manhattan, it was like, well, what can we do about this? Finally, Fox News said, ‘Stop the e-mailing. Stop slamming us. Stop being in our face, and we’ll stop being in your face – by way of taking our story down off the web. We will not retract
it; we will not disavow it; we stand by it. But we will at least take it off the web.’” Following this meeting, within four days of the posting of Cameron’s series on Fox News.com, the transcripts disappeared, replaced by the message, “This story no longer exists”.
What Did Mossad Know and Tell the U.S.?
Whether or not Israeli spies had detailed
foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks, the Israeli authorities knew enough to warn the U.S. government in the summer
of 2001 that an attack was on the horizon. The British Sunday Telegraph reported on September 16, 2001, that two senior agents with the Mossad were dispatched to Washington in August 2001 “to alert the CIA and FBI to the existence of a cell of as many as 200 terrorists said to be preparing a big operation”.
The Telegraph quoted a “senior Israeli security official” as saying the Mossad experts had “no specific information
about what was being planned”. Still, the official
told the Telegraph, the Mossad contacts had “linked the plot to Osama bin Laden”. Likewise, Die Zeit correspondent Oliver
Schröm reported that on August 23, 2001, the Mossad “handed
its American counterpart a list of names of terrorists who were staying in the U.S. and were presumably planning
to launch an attack in the foreseeable
future”. Fox News’ Carl Cameron, in May 2002, also reported warnings by Israel: “Based on its own intelligence, the Israeli government provided ‘general’
information to the United States in the second week of August that an al-Qaeda attack was imminent”. The U.S. government later claimed these warnings were not specific enough to allow any mitigating action to be taken. Mossad expert Gordon Thomas, author of Gideon’s Spies, says German intelligence
sources told him that as late as August 2001 Israeli spies in the United
States had made surveillance contacts with “known supporters of bin Laden in the U.S.A. It was those surveillance contacts that later raised the question: how much prior knowledge did Mossad have and at what stage?”
According to Die Zeit, the Mossad did provide the U.S. government with the names of suspected terrorists Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi, who would eventually hijack the Pentagon plane. It is worth noting that Mihdhar and Hazmi were among the hijackers who operated in close proximity to Israeli “art students” in Hollywood, Florida, and to the Urban Moving Systems
Israelis in northern New Jersey. Moreover, Hazmi and at least three “art students” visited Oklahoma City on almost the same dates, from April 1 through April 4, 2001. On August 24, 2001, a day after the Mossad’s briefing,
Mihdhar and Hazmi were placed by the CIA on a terrorist watch list; adagency
was both prohibited by law from conducting intelligence operations on U.S. soil, and lacked a pool of competent
Arabic-fluent field officers. In such a scenario, the CIA would either have worked actively with the Israelis or quietly
abetted an independent operation on U.S. soil. In his 9/11 investigative book, The Looming Tower, author Lawrence Wright notes that FBI counterterrorism agents, infuriated at the CIA’s failure to fully share information about Mihdhar and Hazmi, speculated that “the agency was shielding Mihdhar and Hazmi because
it hoped to recruit them”. The two al-Qaeda men, Wright notes, “must have seemed like attractive opportunities; however, once they entered the United States they were the province of the FBI...” Wright further observes that the CIA’s reticence to share its information was due to a fear “that prosecutions resulting
from specific intelligence might compromise its relationship with foreign services”. ditionally, it was only after the Mossad warning, as reported by Die Zeit, that the CIA, on August 27, informed the FBI of the presence of the two terrorists. But by then the cell was already in hiding, preparing for attack.
The CIA, along with the 9/11 Commission
in its adoption of the CIA story, claims that Mihdhar and Hazmi were placed on the watch list solely due to the agency’s own efforts, with no help from Mossad. Their explanation of how the pair came to be placed on the watch list, however, is far from credible and may have served as a cover story to obscure the Mossad briefing [See accompanying story on page 8 - “The Kuala Lumpur Deceit”]. This brings up the possibility that the CIA may have known about the existence of the alleged Israeli agents and their mission, but sought, naturally, to keep it quiet. A second, more troubling
scenario, is that the CIA may have subcontracted to Mossad, given that the
When law enforcement officials examined the “art students” phenomenon,
they came to the tentative conclusion that “the Israelis likely had a huge spy operation in the U.S.A. and that they had succeeded in identifying a number of the hijackers”.
When in the spring of 2002 the scenario
of CIA’s domestic subcontracting to foreign intelligence was posed to the veteran CIA/NSA intelligence operative, with whom I spoke extensively, the operative
didn’t reject it out of hand. The operative noted that in recent years the CIA’s human intelligence assets, known as “humint” – spooks on the ground who conduct surveillances, make contacts, and infiltrate the enemy – had been “eviscerated” in favor of the NSA’s far less perilous “sigint”, or signals intelligence
program, the remote interception
of electronic communications. As a result, “U.S. intelligence finds itself going back to sources that you may not necessarily like to go back to, but are required to”, the veteran intelligence operative said. “We don’t like the fact, but our humint structures are gone. Israeli
intel’s humint is as strong as ever. If you have an intel gap, those gaps are
7 / CounterPunch
The CIA Plants a Cover Storyoperative [Khallad]”. Khallad, it was claimed, had been identified in January 2001 from photographs taken at Kuala Lumpur. That identification was noted officially in an alleged January 5, 2001, CIA cable.
According to the CIA, in the spring of 2001 there were reported threats of al-Qaeda attacks on U.S. interests abroad. A CIA agent whom the Commission calls “John” – who was later identified as agent Tom Wilshire by New Yorker writer Lawrence Wright – “wondered where the attacks might occur”.*Wilshire
was particularly interested in cable traffic relating to the Kuala Lumpur meeting the previous year, specifically the January 5, 2001, cable that identified Khallad as having been present at that January 2000 meeting. It was Wilshire’s efforts, beginning in May of 2001, that the CIA claims led to the watch-listing of Mihdhar and Hazmi on the eve of the attacks.
Yet a mile-wide hole quickly appears in this account, because the purported “definitive” identification of Khallad in January 2001 had been entirely mistaken.
In other words, George Tenet in his statement before the Joint Inquiry was either lying or woefully uninformed. According to the CIA’s account, the identification of Khallad, which occurred
a year after the actual Kuala Lumpur meeting, came as the result of an FBI/CIA source, who reportedly was able to pinpoint the photographs of Khallad taken at the meeting.
But, according to the CIA’s own Jan. 5, 2001, cable on the matter, the FBI/CIA source was said to have been shown photographs only of Mihdhar and Hazmi. He was not shown a photograph
of Khallad. According to the Joint Inquiry report, it was later discovered, after Sept. 11, 2001, that the supposed photograph in question - the one reviewed
by the informant in January 2001 - was not of Khallad but of Hazmi himself.
And in fact the source erroneously identified Hazmi as Khallad. Or so the Joint Inquiry report claims.
But in fact there is substantial doubt as to whether even a mistaken identificaThe
possible link between pre-9/
11 Israeli warnings and the
watch-listing of the hijackers Mihdhar and Hazmi was pointed out in late 2004 by a retired top corporate lawyer
named Gerald Shea, who compiled a 166-page memo detailing the alleged operations of the Israeli groups in New Jersey, Florida and elsewhere. In the memo, which is drawn from publicly available source material and which he sent to members of the 9/11 Commission
and the joint House and Senate
intelligence committees, Shea notes that neither the 9/11 Commission’s final report nor the joint report of the intelligence committees “specifically mentions any such [warnings] from the Israeli government”.
Instead, both reports, hewing closely
to the CIA’s public stance, attribute the watch-listing of Mihdhar and Hazmi solely to the bumbling work of U.S. intelligence. But a review of the alleged facts in this route to the watch list, Shea insists, makes one doubt their veracity. “The issue is important”, Shea argues, “because any downplaying of Israeli warnings … draws attention away” from the surveillance role the Israeli groups may have played.
The key element in the CIA’s account
is the claim that in January 2001 the agency had identified an operational link between the Mihdhar-Hazmi duo and one of Bin Laden’s most trusted lieutenants, Khallad, a.k.a. Tawfiq bin Attash, who was suspected of masterminding
the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole.

The J.F.Kennedy

May 28, 2003 - 19:02


Shortly before President John F. Kennedy was murdered in Dallas, Texas, he made certain statements, any one of which would align powerful antagonistic forces against him:
1) He would eliminate the CIA,

2) He would issue Treasury greenbacks (which don’t pay interest) in lieu of financing government deficits through the Federal Reserve, and

3) He spoke against empowering the state of Israel with nuclear capability.


Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy
"...Conspiracy theories abound regarding the Kennedy assassination. However, a new well-written and documented book sites compelling evidence that the Israel’s Mossad and David Ben Gurion were behind the assassination. The reason: Kennedy's disagreement with Ben Gurion's nuclear program...."

"...What the book does say is that: When New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison charged businessman Clay Shaw with participation in the JFK assassination conspiracy Garrison stumbled upon the Israeli Mossad connection to the murder of President Kennedy. Shaw served on the board of a shadowy corporation known as Permindex. A primary shareholder in Permindex was the Banque De Credit International of Geneva, founded by Tibor Rosenbaum, an arms procurer and financier for the Mossad..."


The New World Order
" ...In this century, the degree of control exerted by the Illuminati has advanced to the point that only certain hand-picked individuals, who are groomed and selected by the Illuminati are even eligible to become the prime minister or president of countries like England, Germany, or The United States. It didn't matter whether Bill Clinton or Bob Dole won the Presidency in 1996, the results would have been the same (except maybe for Zipper Gate ). Both men are playing on the same team for the same ball club. Anyone who isn't a team player is taken out: i.e. President Kennedy, Ali Bhutto (Pakistan) and Aldo Moro (Italy). More recently, Admiral Borda, William Colby, and Sonny Bono were also killed because they were either unwilling to go along with the conspiracy to destroy America, weren't cooperating in some capacity, or were attempting to expose/ thwart the Takeover agenda...."

TWO PRESIDENTS WHO DIED DEFYING THE ROTHSCHILDS
"...In our times this control of the issuance of our currency is in the illegal hands of the Federal Reserve, called the Fed, and the principal owner of the Fed's "Class A" stock is--you guessed it--the Rothschild family. The other president brave enough to oppose the banker barons, whose worth was now in the trillions, was President John F. Kennedy..."
"...President Kennedy pledged himself to what was the best for America and cared not how the greedy bankers of the Fed felt. JFK, like Lincoln in the 1860's. dared to have the U. S. Treasury issue U. S. Dollars, not Federal Reserve notes, and placed them into circulation without paying interest to any bankers, just as spelled out in the U. S. Constitution..."


International Bankers, Credit, and the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).
Black's Law Dictionary 1990, defines "Money Changers" as: .....business of a banker... today handled by the international departments of banks." Let me think for a moment, what did Christ do to the "Money Changers". Oh, Yes, he severely interfered with their activity. Three days later he was crucified. Lincoln was killed for interfering with the money changers. Kennedy was slaughtered for interfering with the money changers.


Banking Cartel is the Cause of Humanity's Woes
"...Mullins makes a convincing case that every U.S. President since Wilson has been a lackey of the bankers. J.F. Kennedy was assassinated because he started to print his own U.S. government-backed currency. This is also the transgression that led to the murders of Presidents Abraham Lincoln and James Garfield. Last year alone, the American people paid $360 billion in interest to the bankers. To maintain this massive fraud, the bankers enforce an iron grip on the political and cultural organs of the nation...."



SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE
"...It is interesting to note how many assassinations of Presidents of the United States follow their concern with the issuing of public currency; Lincoln with his Greenback, non-interest-bearing notes, and Garfield, making a pronouncement on currency problems just before he was assassinated..."



The Conspirators Hierarchy - The Committee of 300
"...The Club of Rome, after playing a key role in the Cuban Missile Crisis, attempted to sell its "crisis-management" (the forerunner of FEMA) program to President Kennedy. Several Tavistock scientists went to see the President to explain what it meant, but the President rejected the advice they gave. The same year that Kennedy was murdered, Tavistock was back in Washington to talk with NASA. This time the talks were successful. Tavistock was given a contract by NASA to evaluate the effect of its coming space-program on American public-opinion..."

"...The drug-trade has a connection with the murder of President John F. Kennedy, which foul deed stains the national character and will continue to do so until the perpetrators are found and brought to justice..."

"...As I revealed in my series of monographs on the Kennedy assassination, it was Stephenson who master-minded the operation which was run as a hands-on project by Bloomfield. Fronting for the Kennedy assassination was done through another drug-related front, Permanent Industrial Expositions (PERMINDEX), created in 1957 and centered in the World Trade Mart building in downtown New Orleans..."

"...Bloomfield just happened to be the attorney for the Bronfman family. The World Trade Mart was created by Colonel Clay Shaw and FBI Division Five station-chief in New Orleans, Guy Bannister. Shaw and Bannister were close associates of Lee Harvey Oswald, accused of shooting Kennedy, who was murdered by CIA contract agent Jack Ruby before he could prove that he was not the assassin who shot President Kennedy. In spite of the Warren Commission and numerous official-reports, it has NEVER been established that Oswald owned the Mannlicher rifle said to be the murder weapon (it was not) nor that he had ever fired it...."

"...The humiliation of Nixon was an object-lesson and a warning to future Presidents of the United States not to imagine they could go against the Committee of 300 and win. Kennedy was brutally murdered in full-view of the American people for the same reason; Nixon was not considered worthy-enough to suffer the same fate as John F. Kennedy..."

"...Yet the Assassination Bureau is absolutely real. It exists in Europe and the United States solely to do the bidding of the Committee of 300 to carry-out high-level assassinations where all other remedies have failed. It was PERMINDEX which ran the Kennedy-assassination under the direction of Sir William Stephenson, for years the Queen of England's number one "pest-control" operative..."

"...Clay Shaw, a contract-agent of the CIA, ran PERMINDEX out of the Trade Mart Center in New Orleans. Former New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison came very close to cracking the Kennedy assassination-plot up to the level of Clay Shaw until Garrison was "dealt with" and Shaw was found not guilty of involvement in the Kennedy assassination-plot. The fact that Shaw was eliminated in the manner of Jack Ruby, another CIA contract agent--both died of induced quick-acting cancer--speaks volumes that Garrison was on the right track. (Jack Ruby died of cancer in prison, in January 1967)..."

"...Based upon an examination of SDECE methods in protecting De Gaulle, especially in motorcades, the FBI, Secret Service and the CIA knew exactly how to strip President Kennedy of his security and make it easy for the three PERMINDEX shooters to murder him in Dealey Plaza in November 1963...."

"...On every occasion that a researcher happens upon this astounding central-control-group, he is either successfully bought-off, or else he undergoes some "specialty-training" at the Tavistock Institute after which he becomes a contributor to more fiction, of the James Bond type, i.e., he is derailed and well-rewarded. If such a person as John F. Kennedy should stumble onto the truth about who directs world-events, and cannot be bought, he is assassinated..."

"...Another strange face we see attaching itself to the Holy Christian Order of St. John of Jerusalem, and I use the word strange as it is used in the original Hebrew of the Old Testament to denote the lineage of an individual, is that of Major Louis Mortimer Bloomfield, the man who helped plan the murder of John F. Kennedy. We see photos of this "strange" man wearing with pride the Cross of Malta, the same cross worn on the sleeve of the Knights of the Order of the Garter...."


AN OVERVIEW OF THE THE WAR ON TERRORISM
"...Kennedy rejected Operation Northwoods and senior military officers ordered the documents destroyed. But someone slipped up and the papers were discovered by the Assassination Records Review Board and recently released by the National Archives...."

The Opinions of General Partin and Other Bomb Experts.
"...The Oklahoma City bombing has earned the nickname "Mannlicher-Carcano Bomb," after the cheap Italian-made rifle with a defective scope that was allegedly used to kill President Kennedy. Attorney Jim Garrison joked that the governments nuclear physics laboratory could explain how a single bullet could travel through President Kennedy & Governor Connally five times while making several U-turns, then turns up in pristine condition (an event that no firearms expert in the world has ever been able to duplicate) on a hospital gurney..."



"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 14
Notice the spy tricks. Right after the political assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the mass media, the newsfakers, were handed from the American CIA, the whole alleged background of the aristorcracy-designated "lone assassin", Lee Harvey Oswald. Similarly, right after 9-11, Black Tuesday, a portion of America's secret political police, the FBI, released supposed pictures and details of the alleged Moslem hi-jackers. In round-the-clock coverage following the events, the press whores carefully ignored undisputed details. Namely, that at least seven of the so-called FBI-fingered plane-grabbers, were alive, according to their next of kin, and that such persons never left their overseas locations. And, that someone apparently duplicated or stole their identities.



orwelltoday.com/jfk.shtml

The physical assassination and ongoing character assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy, 35th President of the United States, is a perfect example of Orwellian reality control and falsification of the past. The truth goes down the memory hole.



The Warren Commission and the mainstream movies, books and documentaries churned out these past 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 years since his death have attempted to persuade people to "deny the evidence of their own senses ...reject the evidence of their own ears."



It is the intent of Orwell Today to direct readers to alternate books, movies, essays, commentary and JFK's own words so they can decide for themselves what is true and what is untrue regarding the life and times of John Fitzgerald Kennedy. ~ Jackie Jura



s
Tavistock - The Best Kept Secret in America
Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspi
JFK: The Proof
JFK Murder Plot "Deathbed Confession"

Submitted by cybe on May 7, 2007 - 10:47.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...hbedconfession....

"The "deathbed confession" audio tape in which former CIA agent and Watergate conspirator E. Howard Hunt admits he was approached to be part of a CIA assassination team to kill JFK was aired this weekend - an astounding development that has gone completely ignored by the establishment media...."

reply Mossad and Israel

Submitted by Paul T (not verified) on June 25, 2007 - 23:04.
JFK was killed by the same group that pushes the US into fighting for them. Only Israel benefits from these endless Middle East wars. Iraq is the beginning. As we commit war-crimes in Baghdad, the US gov't commits treason at home by opening mail, eliminating habeas corpus, using the judiciary to steal private lands, banning books like "America Deceived" from Amazon and Wikipedia, conducting warrantless wiretaps and engaging in illegal wars on behalf of AIPAC's 'money-men'. Soon, another US false-flag operation will occur (sinking of an Aircraft Carrier by Mossad) and the US will invade Iran.. Then we'll invade Syria, then Saudi Arabia, then Lebanon (again) then ....
Final link (before Stark County District Library bends to gov't demands and censors the title):
iUniverse - Online Book Store - New Books, Back-In-Print Books, Self-Published Books
reply JFK & USS Liberty

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on June 26, 2007 - 17:40.
In June 1967, the USS Liberty was attacked by Israel while they had total air superiority in the region. Obviously, American intelligence was supposed to believe this was the precursor of a major Soviet intervention.


If Israel was doing that in 1967, the simularities between that and a man who'd been to Russia and who married a KGB Colonel's daughter killing JFK are astonishly remarkable.


Saying JFK was murdered over an Israeli nuclear plant sells books, but I think the truth, something we likely know less than 5% of, would give us all shudders, including moderate supporters of Israel.


Having a Jewish gangster kill Oswald may have even been this heinous story being given the old vaudvillian "hook" when it failed to ignite the desired reaction.


- Eric V.
reply Camelot

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on June 26, 2007 - 22:53.
As John Kennedy found out, there is more than one King in Camelot.

It seems incomprehensible that with the offended powers that be, that they could all get lucky with a lone nut (who had no known motivation, or a rifle that was probably sighted) who had nothing to do with them.

The People don't believe the official story because they rightfully don't trust their government.

reply The mysteriously murdered witnesses

Submitted by Eric V (not verified) on June 27, 2007 - 18:57.
What was the worst thing any of the dead witnesses, many of them diehard Democrats who got up at sunrise that morning to get good seats, could say? "We saw a small group of thugs melt the Secret Service and the Dallas Police Department like they were hot knives going through butter."


Who's that a threat to? I know that if any of these witnesses told me the above as a friend and I learned how they and others died, I'd be terrified. That was the most likely point of the murders, but that still leaves out "why?"


After a couple minutes of pondering, there is only one answer that holds water. What happens if these people come back with another USSR-linked Lee Harvey Oswald trying to kick off WWIII? Sure enough they did, in 1968, they had the Palestinian-born Sirhan Sirhan assassinate RFK just before the elections. (That same day they just missed taking out Andy Warhol for effect.)


For all we know, the movie JFK was released during the Bill Clinton election campaign because they knew his probable fate. Having made that more difficult, they still got at Clinton, a sex addict, with the pornography made flesh by the name of Monica Lewinsky.
reply Cheney's Behind the Scenes Power

oh santa pazienza

ma dei link no? sti papirozzi...

Il copy-paste

[QUOTE=Matthias;690268]Il copy-paste