-
[B][FONT="Book Antiqua"]Prima legge del dibattito: -
Sto leggendo lo speech di Ahmadinejad, dando ogni tanto un occhio a Telelombardia...
Per ora l'impressione[B][FONT="Book Antiqua"]Prima legge del dibattito:Comment
-
Questa è un'indiretta risposta al 3d di sd&m, sono parole di Ahmadinejad:
We are a peaceful, loving nation. We love all nations[B][FONT="Book Antiqua"]Prima legge del dibattito:Comment
-
Dunque: per ora sono a metà discorso, la prima parte è un lungo monologo un po' teologico a dire la verità, su Scienza e Religione. Una premessa un po' lunga a dir la verità (in certi punti anche interessante), per giungere alla questione vera e propria: il progetto nucleare iraniano
AHMADINEJAD: Without cooperation of certain scientists and scholars, we would not have witnessed production of different nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.
Are these weapons to protect global security?
What can a perpetual nuclear umbrella threat achieve for the sake of humanity?
If nuclear war wages between nuclear powers, what human catastrophe will take place?
Today we can see the nuclear effects in even new generations of Nagasaki and Hiroshima residents, which might be witnessed in even the next generations to come.
Presently, the effects of the depleted uranium used in weapons since the beginning of the war in Iraq can be examined and investigated accordingly.
These catastrophes take place only when scientists and scholars are misused by oppressors.
Another point of sorrow: Some big powers create a monopoly over science and prevent other nations in achieving scientific development as well.
This, too, is one of the surprises of our time. Some big powers do not want to see the progress of other societies and nations. They turn to thousands of reasons, make allegations, place economic sanctions to prevent other nations from developing and advancing, all resulting from their distance from human values and the teachings of the divine prophets.
Regretfully, they have not been trained to serve mankind.[B][FONT="Book Antiqua"]Prima legge del dibattito:Comment
-
Il duce avrebbe saputo essere più chiaro
Comment
Tweet
Comment