schusa sono scemo
si ono che sono scemo
mi ritengo scemo
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...ent+is+free%29
* Comment is free
* Cif belief
Jesus as an openly gay man
What if the newly found codices provided evidence of Jesus's same-sex activity? Michael Ruse imagines the implications
*
o
o Share
o Reddit
o Buzz up
*
Comments (163)
* ruse
*
o Michael Ruse
o guardian.co.uk, Monday 4 April 2011 13.15 BST
o Article history
jesus christ gay Jesus Christ as unambiguously and openly gay? Photograph: Corbis
The question: What would you add to the Bible?
The most astounding finding from the newly discovered lead codices is that Jesus Christ was unambiguously and openly gay. He and his disciples formed a same-sex coterie, bound by feelings of love and mutual support. There are recorded instances of same-sex activity – the "beloved disciple" plays a significant role – and there is affirmation of the joys of friendship and of living and loving together.
A whole new complexion is given to that rather puzzling passage where Jesus exhorts his followers to break family ties: "If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple." (Luke 14, 26). It seems clear now that this is less a negative repudiation of family and more a positive exhortation to join in affirmation of a gay lifestyle and love.
There is at least one new parable, that of the two young men. There are clear echoes of the relationship between David and Jonathan, for Jesus speaks of one young man having his soul "knit with the soul" of the other, and loving him "as his own soul". Intriguing is evidence that the Catholics might be closer to the truth about the status of Mary, the mother of Jesus, than are the Protestants. She has a much bigger role in the life of Jesus than many hitherto expected, with Jesus frequently returning home and making much of her.
Conversely, there is at least one incident when Jesus quarrels violently with Joseph, who shows great hostility and makes wild claims about "manliness". Before, one might have thought that, given Mary's virginity, Joseph's attitude was reflecting the ambiguities of his status in the family; but now it seems more probable that we have here a classic example of the Freudian triangle: over-possessive mother, hostile father, gay son.
Why have we known so little about all of this before? A newly discovered Pauline epistle, appropriately to the Athenians, suggests a major Platonic influence, particularly of the Republic. The classically educated Paul, who was himself gay, saw that same-sex activity was inimical to the success of Christianity in the highly homophobic societies in which he lived. Hence, same-sex affections and activity were concealed, to be known to and practised by only the leaders in secret – the guardians of Christianity as one might say. Obviously, this is a tradition that has flourished and lasted. It is not by chance that John Henry Newman is being made a saint.
Finally, the most important news is that nothing in the newly discovered codices challenges in any way the essential message of Christianity. Jesus was the messiah; he died on the cross for our sins; and through his death and resurrection made possible our eternal salvation. Our overriding obligation is to love God and we do this by loving our neighbours as ourselves. Christianity will never be the same again. Christianity will go on completely unchanged.
schusa sono scemo
si ono che sono scemo
mi ritengo scemo
Se esiste un moderatore, chiederei un minimo di rispetto per chi crede. Altrimenti ok, rimediero' con una sincera preghiera per Casoncello:
"Padre perdonalo, perche' non sa' quello che fa"
amate i vostri nemici
il titolo
schusa sono scemo
si ono che sono scemo
mi ritengo scemo
La tua gentilezza e' squisita.
amate i vostri nemici
e te non hai detto nulla sulla news per cui sei ot
speriamo un mod provveda
schusa sono scemo
si ono che sono scemo
mi ritengo scemo
Io sono d'accordo con cono, il titolo andrebbe cambiato. E'decisamente irrispettoso e sicuramente non aiuta il dialogo.
I solemnly swear that i am up to no good...
Perche', di norma esiste un dialogo con chi crede?
Se esiste, e' perche' non crede abbastanza.
I'm laying down, eating snow
My fur is hot, my tongue is cold
On a bed of spider web
I think of how to change myself
A lot of hope in a one man tent
There's no room for innocence
So take me home before the storm
Velvet mites will keep us warm.
schusa sono scemo
si ono che sono scemo
mi ritengo scemo
[QUOTE=terra;1300963]sono d'accordo sul fatto che il termine "frocio" sia irrispettoso. se il titolo fosse "quell'omosessuale di ges
I solemnly swear that i am up to no good...
al quinto post ho invitato a tornare in topic
cosa che finora non
schusa sono scemo
si ono che sono scemo
mi ritengo scemo
Ti ringrazio Babou.
Terra, non e' tanto il titolo del thread quanto il latente disprezzo per la figura del Salvatore e dei Suoi discepoli. Ma sono abituato a ben altro, non c'e' problema.
amate i vostri nemici
qualcosa in topic?
schusa sono scemo
si ono che sono scemo
mi ritengo scemo